Department of Labor Changes Employee Classification Test
The Department of Labor’s (DOL) 2024 rule regarding the classification of employees/independent contractors recently took effect on March 11, 2024. The rule officially repeals the DOL’s 2021 Independent Contractor Status Rule and returns to a “totality of the circumstances” approach.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum standards of employment such as minimum wage, overtime pay, record keeping, and youth employment. These standards extend to employers and employees as defined by the FLSA. However, the FLSA’s standards do not extend to independent contractors. Thus,
FedEx $365 Million Verdict Vacated on Appeal
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has reduced a $366 million verdict from a Texas jury to $284,619 in a race discrimination and retaliation case against FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. (FedEx). Why and how did this happen?
In August 2019, Jennifer Harris reported her manager for discrimination and retaliation because the manager had not assigned a certain customer to her. A written warning from the manager about Harris’ performance followed the next month. Harris said FedEx subsequently conducted a sham investigation of her claims and terminated her in January 2020. Harris filed the su
$10,000 in Sanctions for Using AI
What is the penalty for a pro se party retaining a “consultant” who used “artificial intelligence hallucinations” to prepare an appellate brief with fictitious case law? A Missouri Court of Appeals recently had the opportunity to answer that question.
In Molly Kruse v. Jonathan R. Karlen, et al., Kruse sued her former employer for unpaid wages. Kruse alleged she was chief creative officer for her employer from 2015 to 2019, but that the employer failed to pay her wages for 2018 and 2019. Karlen, appellant, was the owner and chief executive officer of her former employer.
The trial co
Residential Construction Exclusion Bars Coverage
Is a worksite accident that occurred during the construction of a stormwater detention vault excluded from coverage by a residential construction exclusion in a commercial general liability policy? A Washington State court recently answered, yes.
In Evanston Insurance Co. v. NW Classic Builders, LLC, Felipe Flores was injured while constructing a stormwater detention vault for a new residential subdivision in Sammimish, Washington. His employer, ARH & Associates, contracted with NW Classic Builders, the general contractor. Flores sued NW Classic Builders for failing to provide a safe w
Texas Construction Trust Fund Act
With tighter terms on construction loans and permanent financing, payment claims in the construction arena have increased. Noticeable during this uptick are assertions of violations of the Texas Construction Trust Fund Act. The Act is found in Chapter 162 of the Texas Property Code and creates overarching rules for all real property construction projects, with one applying specifically to residential construction over $5,000.
The Construction Trust Fund Act classifies construction payments made to a contractor or subcontractor or one of their officers, directors, agents under a construction co
Supreme Court of Texas 2023 Update
The Supreme Court of Texas issued two important opinions in December 2023: One of which dealing with a savings statute for the statute of limitations and another regarding the applicability of “but for” causation in adverse employment actions.
Sanders, et al. v. The Boeing Company, et al.
In a personal injury suit involving a couple of flight attendants for a major airline, the Supreme Court of Texas answered a certified question from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concerning the breadth of a savings statute that tolls statutes of limitations.
Lee Marvin Sanders and Matthe
$15 Million Verdict for Title IX Discrimination
On December 11, 2023, a federal jury concluded that Thomas Jefferson University and Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Inc. (Jefferson) damaged Dr. Abraham in the amount of $15 million. Dr. Abraham was an orthopedic surgeon who formerly held clinical privileges and a faculty appointment at the hospital. The jury found that Jefferson violated Title IX when it failed to properly investigate his claims for sexual misconduct against a colleague and acted with a bias against him since the offending party was female.
Dr. Abraham alleged he held a party in his home in June 2018 at which a “sexu