Injunction Denied for $17.20/Hour Federal Minimum Wage
A legal attempt to prevent enforcement of the $17.20 per hour minimum wage for federal contracts has recently failed. How will that impact you?
Arkansas Valley Adventure LLC (“AVA”) and the Colorado River Outfitters Association (“CROA”) filed suit in US Court in Colorado requesting an injunction of a 2021 Executive Order increasing minimum wage for certain categories of federal work to $15 per hour. In April 2024, the US 10th Circuit Court of Appeals denied their request, finding that the 2021 Executive Order has a nexus close enough to promoting economy and efficiency in federal pro
No Standing for Additional Insured
A Texas federal court recently held that an additional insured lacked standing to file an independent claim against an insurer. In Antares Underwriting, Ltd. v. Magellan E&P Holdings, Magellan entered into an Emergency Agreement with Great White Well Control (“GWWC”) to provide well control services. The Agreement had an effective date of September 1, 2020. Antares Underwriting Limited (“Antares”) issued an energy policy to Magellan with a policy term of June 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021. When GWWC made a claim for additional insured coverage under the energy policy, Antares den
Non-Compete Ban Spawns Lawsuits
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued its final version of Rules Concerning Unfair Methods of Competition (Rule). The Rule becomes effective 120 days after being published in the Federal Register. Almost immediately, two separate lawsuits were filed in Texas seeking to stay enforcement of the Rule and a finding that the FTC exceeded its authority in issuing the Rule. Why all the fuss?
The Rule, only 9 pages long, is preceded by 560 pages of commentary and justification by the FTC, perhaps foreboding the Rule’s significance and controversy. The Rule bars an employ
Verdict Vacated Over Borrowed Worker Doctrine
Michael Chiles was working at an oil and gas processing facility in West Texas when pressurized fluid unexpectedly shot out of the end of a hose he was carrying. Chiles was thrown to the ground and taken to the hospital shortly thereafter, where he was diagnosed with a torn rotator cuff that required two separate surgeries to repair. Chiles sued Priority Artificial Lift Services, LLC (“Priority”) and EP Energy E&P Company, L.P. (“EP Energy”) for damages caused by the incident. The parties proceeded to trial and the jury returned a verdict finding Priority and EP Energy liable for C
Lawsuit Impacts Corporate Transparency Act
On January 1, 2024, an important change in the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) took effect. This change created ownership reporting requirements for private companies. Specifically, all entities, except sole proprietorships, some general partnerships, wealth planning trusts, unincorporated entities, and foreign entities not registered to do business in the United States, have to report to the federal government who the beneficial owners of the entity are. A beneficial owner includes anyone who exercises substantial control over the entity or owns or controls twenty-five percent or more
$70 Million Verdict Reversed on Post-Trial Motions
In March 2024, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in the matter of Yarbrough v. Glow Networks, Inc. overturned a $70 million employment discrimination verdict and ordered a new trial for two claims relating to only two specific Plaintiffs. How did this happen?
In December 2019, fourteen former employees of Glow Networks, Inc. (“Glow”), 13 of whom are Black, filed suit against their former employer for racial discrimination in the workplace. All Plaintiffs but one alleged racial discrimination based on tangible actions and/or a hostile work environment. Some Plaintiff
Changes in Texas Lien Law: Design Professionals
Although the changes to Chapter 53 of the Texas Property Code, the statute governing Mechanic’s Liens in Texas, went into effect on January 1, 2022, questions still abound regarding the rights and responsibilities of project consultants on construction projects, i.e. architects, engineers, and the like. Below is primer on the changes to Chapter 53 and how they affect these specific individuals as well as a brief discussion on the changes to statutory retainage and lien law.
For starters, Section 53.021 removes the requirement that an architect, engineer or surveyor provide services “under